Showing posts with label Railways. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Railways. Show all posts

Tuesday, 3 April 2012

TUC and unions launch campaign to fight job cuts and fare hikes on the railways



The TUC, railway unions and transport campaigners have launched a campaign to fight job cuts, service reductions, ticket office closures and fare hikes in the rail industry.
At a meeting with MPs at the House of Commons on Tuesday 20 March, union leaders and representatives from the Campaign for Better Transport raised their concerns about the government's proposals for the future of rail as outlined in the Rail Command Paper. They were joined by Shadow Transport Minister Maria Eagle.
Concerns raised included:
* The creation of multiple regional 'Railtracks' through the fragmentation of Network Rail, its capture by private operators through greater integration with Train Operating Companies (TOCs) and the selling of rail infrastructure through regional concessions, putting maintenance and safety at risk.
* Service reductions and punishing fare hikes for peak time commuters resulting from more flexible and longer TOC franchises.
* The closure of more than 650 ticket offices across the country, penalising staff and passengers.
* Job cuts of up to 20,000 rail staff on stations, trains, ticket offices, signalling and maintenance.
* Plans to undermine existing union agreements across the industry, with the freezing of above inflation pay rises and revised terms and conditions for new starters.
Rail unions also continued to highlight the costs of privatisation and pressed the case for better value for money and cost effectiveness through a national integrated railway under public ownership.

TUC Deputy General Secretary Frances O'Grady, who was chairing the event, said: "Our railways are critical to the success of our nation and our economy. But for too long, the costs of our dysfunctional privatised rail system have fallen on the passenger and the taxpayer while billions have leaked out of the industry through wasteful transaction costs, dividends and profits.
"The government's proposals do nothing to address the problems created by privatisation. Despite all the evidence to the contrary, the government mantra remains: privatisation works, let's have more of it.
"The TUC is proud to support railway workers, passengers and communities in defence of affordable, accessible and safer rail. We will be stepping up our efforts and building on the fantastic partnership we have put in place with unions and transport campaigners in the months ahead."

General Secretary of ASLEF Mick Whelan said: "There is no strategy at the heart of the Rail Command Paper. It leaves a lot of guesswork. TOCs are going to have to find £700m savings year on year, and they will effectively be writing their own franchises. The simplest way for them to make those savings is to cut staff and wage costs."
General Secretary of RMT Bob Crow said: "The McNulty Review was right on some things. European railways are often more cost-effective and offer better and cheaper services. The case is clear that integrated, national state run railways offer better value and efficiency than the fragmented privatised mess we face in this country. The solution is simple, bring back rail under a single integrated management under public ownership."
General Secretary of TSSA Manuel Cortes said: "All the evidence suggests that passengers want staff on trains and at stations. In many cases, the booking office workers are the only staff left at that station. You close those ticket offices and those stations become deserted, with huge implications for passenger safety and security. If the government and TOCs want to cut ticket office staff, they are going to have the fight of their lives."
National Officer for Rail at Unite Julia Long said: "We need a rail industry that delivers for passengers and the wider UK economy. That includes train procurement that supports UK manufacturing. The government has made some positive statements around the need to secure UK benefits from train orders - following hard union campaigning - but  plans to delegate more train procurement to the train operators will undermine any serious attempts at an effective industrial strategy for UK train manufacturing."
Campaigns Director at Campaign for Better Transport Richard Hebditch said: "Some of the proposals on ticketing reform, such as the commitment to part-time season tickets and increasing smart ticketing technology, could be helpful. However passengers want available staff, they want affordable trains and they want a reliable service.
"The government claims to want to reduce ticket prices but this is only once the ambitious savings have been achieved and economic circumstances change. For the foreseeable future, we expect to see inflation plus three per cent fare rises on regulated fares and now there will punishing fare hikes for those commuters who travel during peak hours, most of whom are forced to do so by the hours that they work."
Responding to the other speakers Maria Eagle said: "The government's rail strategy is set to put private profit before passengers thanks to its inability to stand up to vested interests. Passengers are already feeling the impact of fare rises of up to 11 per cent this year thanks to the government's decision to give back to train companies the right to hike fares by more than the so-called fare cap. We now know from the refranchising tender documents that bidders have been promised the right to hike fares by eight per cent above inflation in 2013 and 2014 and then six per cent above inflation every year for the next 15 years.
"To add to the pressure facing commuters, ministers are also set to give TOCs even greater freedoms, including permitting even more expensive 'super peak' tickets and closing ticket offices, making it harder to get the cheapest deals.
TOCs.
"As a result of these plans, profit will now be the driving principle behind rail infrastructure in addition to rail services. The proposed deep alliances will see a single regional manager for the first time being accountable not just to Network Rail, but equally to private train company bosses. The creation of a set of mini-'Railtracks' will take us back to the days when decisions on infrastructure and maintenance were profit-driven."

Monday, 6 June 2011

The Midlands TUC is very concerned about the planned reduction in services for passengers at railway ticket offices. Below we reprint the text of a letter sent to the London Midland Franchise Manager at the Department for Transport.

Dear Mr FrizzellLondon Midland ticket offices

I am writing on behalf of the Midlands TUC to request that you uphold the objections lodged by Passenger Focus and London TravelWatch to proposals made by London Midland to reduce ticket office opening times at 87 stations.

You will be aware that there has been overwhelming and widespread opposition to the proposed cuts. Petitions with more than 14,500 signatures, 3271 campaign postcards and over 700 individual responses objecting to London Midland’s plans were received by Passenger Focus during the three week consultation period.
Additionally an Early Day Motion was tabled in the House of Commons by Coventry South MP Jim Cunningham, calling for the proposals to be withdrawn due to the detrimental effect they will have on services and jobs.

London Midland’s plans to introduce 29 Ticket Vending Machines (TVM) as replacements for staffed ticket offices are wholly inadequate. Indeed, Passenger Focus chief executive Anthony Smith pointed out that in the representations they received, passengers were “almost unanimous in their request for staff at stations, raising concerns about ticket machines and the need for staff for advice and assistance on ticket sales”.

A series of concerns were expressed by passengers during the public consultation period in relation to TVMs;

• Ticket machines do not sell the full range of rail products

• Season ticket holders cannot buy extensions

• Seats cannot be reserved

• Ticket machines do not sell promotion tickets

• The complexity of the ticketing structure means passengers need advice from trained railway staff to secure the cheapest available ticket and best possible route

• Machines cannot deal with damaged or mis-purchased tickets

• Machines are not always conveniently located

• Machines are subject to vandalism

Furthermore, passengers have made it clear both to Passenger Focus/London TravelWatch that a staff presence helps to maintain station facilities, improves security and offers reassurance to travellers, particularly those who feel most vulnerable such as women travelling alone.

The sheer scale of evidence, gathered in unprecedented numbers from across the whole of the London Midland area, presented to Passenger Focus confirms our view that the proposed changes are unnecessary.

I would therefore urge you protect station services and facilities by upholding the Passenger Focus objection.
Yours sincerely

CHERYL PIDGEON
Regional Secretary
TUC Midlands Region

Thursday, 19 May 2011

McNulty review fails to address causes of inefficiency and waste, says TUC

Responding to the review of rail value for money published today (Thursday) by former Civil Aviation Authority Chairman Sir Roy McNulty, TUC Deputy General Secretary Frances O’Grady said: “The report rightly highlights the increased costs to passengers and taxpayers from the privatisation of our railways. But its prescriptions are wide of the mark and will make conditions worse for both commuters and rail staff.
“Privatisation has failed – as the comparisons with state run rail networks in Europe clearly show – so it is disappointing that little consideration has been given to the benefits of a nationally integrated public rail system.
“Cutting the number of ticket office workers, station staff and train crews is not what passengers want, and there is no link between staff costs and the increasing levels of taxpayer subsidy.
“The same cannot be said for the privatised train operating companies, where profits have risen in direct response to increases in public funding. If the McNulty review is serious in its attempt to protect the taxpayer from bailing out the problems in our rail industry, then it is barking up the wrong tree by targeting staff costs. Average earnings for rail workers have not risen substantially beyond national averages and gains in workforce productivity have been in advance of industry pay rises.
“Fragmentation is a prime reason why our railways are so expensive, so it is bizarre that the report recommends more with the potential break-up of Network Rail. Passengers will be rightly concerned about the implications for ticket prices and services, particularly in rural areas.
“The report makes positive recommendations too. Simpler ticketing is something commuters have been crying out for, and taking a more strategic and joined up approach to procurement offers great potential for supporting UK manufacturing.
“We welcome the call for the rail industry to work together and we look forward to rail unions playing a key role in informing and shaping the industry’s response to these recommendations.”